Gabriele Maria Noce vs Edison Ambarzumjan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Noce vs Ambarzumjan analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriele Maria Noce vs Edison Ambarzumjan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Noce 1 - 1 Ambarzumjan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Noce has won 51.98% of points on their second serve, while Ambarzumjan has won 49.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Noce, in recent form, has won 52.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ambarzumjan has won 51.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.24% and 30.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Noce has saved 54.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ambarzumjan has saved 66.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Noce has won 47.83% of matches played (W/L 22/ 24), with Ambarzumjan winning 56.76% (W/L 21/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Noce has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 108/ 104), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Ambarzumjan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Noce has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.89% of matches (W/L 22/ 23), where as Ambarzumjan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Noce winning 1 times and Ambarzumjan being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Noce winning 2 and Ambarzumjan winning 2. The last match between Noce and Ambarzumjan was at the M15 Selva Gardena, 01-11-2022, First, I.hard with Gabriele Maria Noce getting the victory 7-6(0) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Noce and Ambarzumjan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Noce winning 0 times and Ambarzumjan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Noce winning 1, and Ambarzumjan 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Noce has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.04 while Ambarzumjan has played against players with an average rank of 60.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Noce has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ambarzumjan has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Noce has converted 44.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ambarzumjan has converted 40.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
889
Rank
793
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
49% (144-151)
Career Total W/L
52% (44-41)
65% (15-8)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Gabriele Maria Noce vs Edison Ambarzumjan For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Noce VS Ambarzumjan
Noce VS Ambarzumjan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Gabriele Maria Noce | Edison Ambarzumjan |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 22 | 21 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:50:0 | 1:50:0 |
1st Serve % | 53% (79/149) | 59% (85/143) |
1st Serve Win% | 68% (54/79) | 58% (49/85) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (35/70) | 59% (34/58) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Points W% | 42% (60/143) | 40% (60/149) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Noce VS Ambarzumjan H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(0) 6-2 |
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
6-3 7-6(8) |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Gabriele Maria Noce
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gabriele Maria Noce | Edison Ambarzumjan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 62% (16/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 57% (29/22) | 63% (36/21) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (248/220) | 53% (316/276) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 65% (15/8) | 62% (13/8) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.2 |
Aces Total | 28 | 59 |
DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 57 | 36 |
Avg Match Time | 1:32:20 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 217.74 | 53.08 |
1st Serve % | 60% (756/1250) | 57% (601/1059) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (474/756) | 71% (425/601) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (256/494) | 49% (226/458) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (62/138) | 40% (36/89) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (534/1262) | 38% (394/1041) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 65% (15/8) | 62% (16/10) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 62% (16/26) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 64% (7/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (6/6) | 20% (1/5) |
1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 80% (20/16) |
1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 20% (20/4) |
1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (6/0) |
Gabriele Maria Noce Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Gabriele Maria Noce
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Francesco Forti
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
104)
0
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Seydina Andre
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
0
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
58
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Marco Miceli
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Florent Bax
Player
Gabriele Maria Noce
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Marcel Zielinski
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Andrea Picchione
Player
Gabriele Maria Noce
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Fausto Tabacco
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Pasquale De Giorgio
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Felipe Virgili Berini
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Edison Ambarzumjan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Maik Steiner
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
69 of
124)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
33 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(7) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Sina Moghimi
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Aaron Gil Garcia
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
SF |
Luca Fantini
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Rafael Ymer
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Pablo Trochu
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Unknown Player
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
1
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(2) 7-6(3) 16-14 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Noce Vs Ambarzumjan Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Noce are available here and Ambarzumjan photos here.